Spinal anesthesia: how can we improve patient satisfaction?
نویسنده
چکیده
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. CC Since spinal anesthesia was introduced in clinics about 100 years ago, many studies have examined whether spinal anesthesia decreases operating time, mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, number of patients requiring a blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, pain, opioid-related adverse effects, and the length of hospital stay when compared with general anesthesia. Macfarlane et al. [1] performed a systemic review of the contemporary literature comparing general anesthesia and/or systemic analgesia with regional anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty. They did not suggest a difference in blood loss or duration of surgery. However, regional anesthesia reduced postoperative pain and opioid-related adverse effects in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Length of hospital stay may also be reduced and rehabilitation facilitated by regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia. They found insufficient evidence from randomized, controlled trials alone to conclude whether anesthetic technique influenced mortality, cardiovascular morbidity other than postoperative hypotension, or the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the setting of routine thromboprophylaxis. In this issue of the journal, Rhee et al. [2] prospectively evaluated factors affecting dissatisfaction and refusal of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiologists have a duty to inform patients about risks and alternatives to anesthetic methods. It is the basic spirit of medical ethics to allow patients to choose an anesthesia method. Anesthesiologists frequently hold a biased view when they choose the anesthetic method rather than obtain the opinion of patients, and they have a variety of reasons for choosing a given anesthetic technique. A technique may be chosen simply because we know it; it may be a favorite technique or a less familiar technique chosen to maintain competence/experience or to teach. Other reasons are a request from patients or surgeons [3]. If anesthesiologist allow patients to decide the anesthetic method, in many cases the patients say " I don't know. It's up to you " ; " Is spinal anesthesia painful? " , " I don't want to awaken during the operation " , " Will I feel pain after the operation? " , or " Does spinal anesthesia cause back pain? ". Therefore, the anesthesiologists must explain fully about the applicable anesthesia method and help patients to decide the procedure by …
منابع مشابه
ارزیابی رضایتمندی بیماران از خدمات بیهوشی
Aim and Background: The assessment of patient satisfaction with anesthesia, the balance between expectations and perception of what was received, is an essential component of continuous quality improvement in anesthesiology. In our center there have been few studies conducted in the anesthesia field, which hav...
متن کاملP-179: Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery of Infertile Patients
Background: Laparoscopy is one of the most common surgical procedures. General anesthesia as the only suitable technique for laparoscopic procedures is a concept of the past. A problem with modern general anesthetics is that even though patients can be awake and oriented shortly after cessation of the anesthetic. There is growing evidence suggesting that regional anesthesia has an important rol...
متن کاملFactors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia
BACKGROUND Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia conducted for many surgical procedures. Multiple factors can affect the success, the side effects, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study was undertaken prospectively to discover factors affecting dissatisfaction and refusal of spinal anesthesia. METHODS Starting in December 2007, patients who underwent spina...
متن کاملComparison of patient satisfaction and cost in spinal and general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery.
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and cost in spinal and general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was performed on 66 ASA class I-II patients with one level lumbar disc herniation (LDH). In this prospective study, patients were assigned randomly to either spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia groups. Hemodynamic variables, intra...
متن کاملمقایسه بیهوشی عمومی با بی حسی نخاعی از نظر میزان خونریزی حین عمل نفرولیتوتریپسی جلدی
Background and aims: Percutaneus nephrolithotrips is commonly used for the removal ofstones. This procedure can be performed under general or spinal anesthesia. In this study weevaluated amount of Bleeding and transfusion needs between two mentioned anesthesia routes.Methods and materials: A total of 80 ASA I-II patients undergoing PCNL were randomlyallocated to receive spinal anesthesia (3 ml ...
متن کاملPopliteal sciatic nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in hallux valgus surgery
BACKGROUND We compared clinical properties and patient satisfaction between spinal anesthesia and popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSNB) for hallux valgus surgery. METHODS Forty patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery were divided into spinal group (spinal anesthesia with 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine [n = 20]) and PSNB group (PSNB with 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine mixed with 10 ml of normal salin...
متن کامل